The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking admission to the selection posts reserved for STs. The court held that since the selection process was already complete, no writ could disturb the seat allocation.
Writ petition dismissed as having rendered infructuous; liberty reserved to move again if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 5304 of 2009
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Shri Kishore Bhaduri with Shri Shubham Pandey, Advocates. For Respondent/State : Shri Avinash Choubey, PL.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
05/03/2020 :
2
Chhattisgarh Lok Sewa (Anusuchit Jatiyon, Anusuchit Janjatiyon Aur Anya Pichde Varg Ke Liye Aarakshan) Adhiniyam, 1994.
Sd/Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Barve
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ can be issued to allow the petitioner to compete for reserved seats when the selection process is already complete?
Whether the petitioner's application for 20% ST reserved seats is maintainable?
Ku. Anita Nag
State of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
