Disposed

Dr. Mamta Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC6 Nov 2020WPS/4057/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation along with relevant documents to claim the benefit of enhanced pay scales (Pravar Shreni and Varishtha Pravar Shreni Vetanman) with effect from 2013 and 2019, directed to be decided by the respondent within four months.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file detailed representation regarding pension scales with effect from 2013 and 2019 to be decided within four months.

Dr. Mamta Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 4057 of 2020

¶5

Dr. Mamta Pandey W/o - Dr. R.K. Pandey Aged About 59 Years Gyanaecologist Specialist, District Hospital - Durg, R/o- C/o- Dr. R.K. Pandey, Pandey Nursing Home, Station Road, Durg, District - Durg (Chhattisgarh) 491001, --- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Health, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶8

Commissioner Directorate Of Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶9

Director Directorate of Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, Third Floor, Block-A, New Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh). --- Respondents

¶10

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Advocate For the State/Respondents : Ms. Sunita Jain, Govt. Advocate

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

¶12

Order on Board

¶13

06-11-2020

¶14

Learned cousnel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner joined her service on 13.3.1987 and she is entitled to get benefit of Pravar Shreni Vetanman (37400-67000+Grade Pay 8700) and Varishtha Pravar Shreni Vetanman (37400-67000 + Grade Pay 8900). He would submit that Dr. Padmini Singh though joined subsequent to the petitioner in 1990, she has been granted benefit of Pravar Shreni Vetanman of 37400-67000 Grade Pay 8700 on 07.1.2020 and one Dr. S. Murli Mohan Murty though he joined in the year 1984, he has been granted benefit of Pravar Shreni Vetanman on 07.1.2020. According to the Circular of the State and direction dated 01.04.2013 (Annexure P-5) if the person has worked for six years in the Varishtha Shreni Vetanman he would be entitled for Pravar shreni Vetanman and after completion of six years in Pravar Shreni Vetanman

¶15

¶16

(37400-6700+Grade Pay 8700) he would be entitled for Varishtha Pravar Shreni Vetanman (37400-67000+Grade Pay 8900). He would submit that according to the circular of the State if a person have served in the naxal affected area the grant of pay scale from six years would be reduced to four years.

¶17

Learned counsel submits that therefore since the similarly placed persons who joined with the petitioner and the person who joined subsequent to the petitioner have been granted the pay scale the petitioner is also entitled toget such pay scale, therefore, the petitioner may be given liberty to make a detailed representation to the respondent no.1 Secretary Department of Health which may be directed to be decided within a stipulated time.

¶18

Considering the limited prayed made by the petitioner, the petitioner is given liberty to file a detailed representation along-with all the relevant documents to get the benefit of Pravar Shreni Vetanman (37400-6700+Grade Pay 8700) with effect from 01.01.2013 and Varishtha Pravar Shreni Vetanman (37,400-67,000 + Grade Pay 8900) with effect from 01.01.2019 and the petitioner shall be at liberty to attach the documents to show the fact that other persons who have joined subsequent to the petitioner have been given the benefit of the said pay scale from the prior date. The representation may be made within a period of three weeks from today and if such representation is filed before respondent No.1 Secretary, Department of Health then the said representation shall be decided within a further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation.

¶19

With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.

¶20

Sd/GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE

¶21

R a o

Dr. Mamta Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Mamta Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tijau Ram Tarak Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramesh Kumar Kurre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Padum Kumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Hori Lal Verma Vs S. Prakash

Neelkanth Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chandra Shekhar Mahilange Vs State of Chhattisgarh