In a writ petition seeking a direction to appear in an interview, the High Court discharged the matter without adjudication after finding the Commission had already granted the relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 2803 of 2020
2
District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
3
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
4
For Petitioners : Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate. For State : Mrs. Akanksha Jain, Dy. G.A. For respondents : Mr. Anand Mohan Tiwari, Advocate No.2 and 3.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order
14-09-2020
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Raju
Pratap Kumar Ratre and others
State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Higher Education
Chhattisgarh State Public Service Commission
Controller Of Examination Chhattisgarh State Public Service Commission
Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board (Vyapam)
Director Directorate Of Higher Education
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
