Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner, subject to a statutory alternative remedy, with liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 52 of 2020
Lakshman Singh -Versus- State of Chhattisgarh & others
| 08/01/2020 | Mr. Sunil Tripathi , Advocate for the petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A. for the State. |
|
| Considering the fact that there is a statutory alternative remedy available to the petitioner, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with a liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned order. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. |
|
| Subject to the petitioner's furnishing the photocopy of the original order, the certified copy be returned back to the petitioner. |
|
| Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE |
Ved
Lakshman Singh
State of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
