Disposed

Kalyan Kumar Sen v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC16 Jan 2020WPC/5013/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition jointly submitted by parties, referring to a previous order dated 05.12.2019, granting liberty to revive the matter based on the outcome of a pending second appeal filed by the respondent society.

What did the court decide?

Disposed with liberty to revive depending on the result of the second appeal filed by the respondent society.

Kalyan Kumar Sen Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. — Property and Title | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

• WPC No. 5013 of 2010

¶4

Kalyan Kumar Sen S/o Late Shri Arun Kumr Sen, aged about 51 years, R/o Rangmandir Campus, Gandhi Chowk, Raipur C.G.

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Town Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, C.G.

¶8

The Collector, Raipur, District, Raipur, C.G.

¶9

The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

¶10

Bhatkhande Lalit Kala Shikshan Samitee Gandhi Chowk, Raipur, Through President- Shekhar Sen Gupta, S/o Late Arun Kumar Sen, aged about 48 years, R/o Gurukul Parishar, Kalibadi Chowk, Raipur, District-Raipur C.G.

¶11

The Registrar, Firm and Society, Raipur, District Raipur C.G.

¶12

	---- Respondents
__________________________________ For Petitioner :	_________________________________ Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Advocate.
For State/Respondents No.1,2&5:	Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer.
For Respondent No.3 :	Ms. Richa Dwivedi, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.
For Respondent No.4 :	Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate.

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

16/01/2020

¶16

Learned counsel for both the parties jointly submit that for the reasons stated and order dated 05.12.2019 passed in WPC No.1283 of 2009, this petition may also be disposed off at this stage with liberty granted as in WPC No.283 of 2009.

¶17

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the order passed on 05.12.2019 in WPC No.1283 of 2009, this petition is also disposed off with liberty to revive depending upon the result of second appeal filed by the society namely Bhatkhande Lalit Kala Shikshan Samitee.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge

¶20

Ravi

Kalyan Kumar Sen v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalyan Kumar Sen v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Sai Prasad Gas Agency Vs Union of India and Ors.

Orissa Concrete and Allied Indu.Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sukho Bai Vs Smt. Amrita Devi and Ors.

Surendra Rai and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Sitaram Sethiya Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Board of Revenue