Disposed

M/S Landmark Royal Engineering (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC10 Dec 2020WPC/2972/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petition challenging the non-decision of an appeal against de-registration under Clause 7.1 of the Centralised Procedures, 2014. The High Court directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal within 30 days and observe Clauses 6.5 and 7.1 of the Centralised Procedures.

What did the court decide?

Directing the appellate authority to decide the pending appeal within 30 days and observing Clauses 6.5 and 7.1 of the Centralised Procedures, 2014.

M/S Landmark Royal Engineering (I) Pvt… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

-1-

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶3

WPC No. 2972 of 2020

¶4

M/s Landmark Royal Engineering (I) Pvt. Ltd. Through Mrs. Richa Jain, Director /Authorized Representative W/o Nishant Jain, R/o House No. 2207, Siddha Shikhar Vistar, Shanti Nagar, Ring Road No. 02, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh

¶8

Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Capitol Complex, Sector-19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh

¶9

Chief Engineer (Planning) Public Works Department Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Capital Complex, Sector- 19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh

¶10

---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Siddharth Shukla, Advocate. For State : Mr. Amrito Das, Addl. A.G.

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

Order On Board

10.12.2020

Heard

The only prayer in this petition is that the license of the petitioner firm has been De-registered in terms of Clause 7.1 of the Centralised Procedures of the Government of Chhattisgarh for Suspension, Demotion, Nonrenewal & De-registration of Contractors/Firms, 2014.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against such Deregistration, the petitioner has preferred an appeal and as per the guidelines of 6.5, the appeal if so filed against De-registration as far as practical it shall be decided within 30 days. However, the petitioner though has filed the appeal on 28.08.2020, it has not been decided till date.

¶17

-2-

¶18

Without going into the merits of this case, considering the guideline which has been placed on record, specially clause 6.5. of the Centralised Procedures of the Government of Chhattisgarh for Suspension, Demotion, Non-renewal & De-registration of Contractors/Firms, 2014, the appellate authority shall take all effort to decide the case within a further period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall also be given an opportunity of hearing before such orders have passed.

¶19

With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off.

¶20

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge

¶21

Aks

M/S Landmark Royal Engineering (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Landmark Royal Engineering (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S G. S. Fuel Point Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jujhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vasu Dev Singh Thakur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Radha Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Govind Ram Narang Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S Landmark Engineer Vs State of Chhattisgarh