This Court dismissed the second writ petition regarding the place of Gram Panchayat construction, holding that Article 226 does not empower it to determine the appropriate site for building construction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 2929 of 2020
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Mrs. Sunita Jain, G.A.
2
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order
03.12.2020
3
issue has already attained the finality in the earlier round of litigation, this Court cannot direct the construction of a particular building in a particular place in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and no relief can be granted.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Vishakha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct the construction of a Gram Panchayat building in a particular place under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Gadiram Netam
Guddu Ram Mandavi
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
