Disposed

Jeevan Lal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC9 Oct 2020WPC/2332/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner sought expedited execution proceedings for possession of land under a final decree. The Court directed relevant respondents to take appropriate steps within 90 days.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 2 and 4 to take appropriate steps for execution of possession proceedings within 90 days.

Jeevan Lal Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Execution and Attachment | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

WP(C) No. 2332 of 2020

¶4

Jeevan Lal S/o Late Borra Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Singhra , Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶8

The Sub Divisional Magistrate Sakti , District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶9

The Tahsildar Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

¶10

The Station House Officer Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶11

The Revenue Inspector Malkharoda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

¶12

Laxmi Prasad S/o Shri Bhuruwa Lal Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Singhra, Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

¶13

¶14

	---- Respondents
For Petitioner	: Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, Adv.
For State	: Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Addl. A.G.

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

¶16

Order on Board

¶17

09.10.2020

¶18

The limited grievance that the petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents to conclude the execution proceedings that the petitioner has filed before the respondent No. 2, where the matter is pending for quite some time.

¶19

According to the petitioner, he has a judgment and decree in his favour dated 26.11.2011, which has since attained finality and there

¶20

is no appeal or any proceedings from the said judgment and decree before any Court of Law presently pending. Based upon the said judgment and decree, he has moved an application before the respondent No. 2 seeking possession of the land situated in Khasra Nos. 125/5, 149/5, 125/6, 149/6, 125/7 & 149/7 total measuring 1.48 acres.

¶21

Learned Additional A.G. submits that his application has already been processed by the respondent No. 2, who inturn has sought for the Assistance of the Police Authorities for the execution of the said order and the same shall be done at the earliest in accordance with law.

¶22

Given the said submission by the Counsel for the parities, this Court is of the view that there is no purpose in keeping the writ petition pending, ends of justice would meet, if the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No. 2 and 4 to take appropriate steps at the earliest in accordance with law preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶23

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

¶24

Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) Judge

¶25

Jyotijha

Jeevan Lal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeevan Lal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Kumar Amrit Vs S. Prakash

Motilal Dewangan Vs S.Prakash

Gaukaram Verma Vs Shri Shiv Anant Tayal

Navin Kumar Singh Vs Union of India

Sun Medical Systems Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Prakash Kedia Vs State of Chhattisgarh