Disposed

Virendra Kumar Sen v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC5 Oct 2020WPC/2206/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought remedy for unpaid dues for hair cutting services at educational institutions. Court disposed of writ petition by directing petitioner to file a fresh claim and respondents to scrutinize and pay dues within 90 days if entitled. No reasoning provided.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file fresh claim; respondents directed to scrutinize and clear dues within 90 days if entitled.

Virendra Kumar Sen Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

Writ Petition (C) No. 2206 of 2020

¶5

Virendra Kumar Sen S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh Sen, Aged About 47 Years, Caste - Nai, R/o Ward No. 06, In Front Of Awasthi Colony, Greedam, Civil And Revenue District-South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Education/Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue District – Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

2. The Collector Cum Mission Leader, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission Sukama, Revenue District - Sukama And Civil District Sukama, Chhattisgarh

¶10

3. Chief Executive Officer Cum Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Sukama, Revenue District - Sukama And Civil District - Sukama Chhattisgarh

¶11

---- Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate For State : Mr. Raghvendra Verma, Govt. Advocate

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board

¶14

05.10.2020

¶15

1. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a person who was given the work of hair cutting at various Hostels/Ashrams run by the respondents. However, in-spite of many years have passed, the petitioner till date has not been paid monetary due that he was entitled for. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have till

¶16

¶17

date never disputed the entitlement of the petitioner. The petitioner has been approaching the authorities for a considerable period of time but with no effective response on the same.

¶18

2. Given the limited nature of grievance that the petitioner has raised, this Court is of the opinion that disposal of the writ petition, at this juncture, would meet ends of justice. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file a fresh claim/representation before the respondents and the respondents are directed to duly scrutinize the same. If the petitioner is found entitled for any payment, the same shall be cleared at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days positively from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶19

3. The present writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

¶20

Sd/P. Sam Koshy Judge

¶21

Khatai

Virendra Kumar Sen v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virendra Kumar Sen v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Toppo Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Akhil Kumar Rathor Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S Singhania Enterprises Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Nirja Sondhi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mahamaya Aishwarya Laxmi Swa- Sahayata Samooh (Self Help Group), Junwani, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jagriti Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh (Self Help Group) Vs State of Chhattisgarh