Counsel for the petitioner sought disposal of the writ petition based on a connected case. The court reserved liberty to revive the matter and disposed of the petition.
Petition disposed with liberty to revive if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
• WPC No. 1444 of 2010
Versus
---- Respondents
___________________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasachi Bhaduri, Advocate. For Respondent/s : None appears.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
15/01/2020
Sd/Judge
Ravi
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s Sai Prasad Gas Agency Versus Union Of India And Ors.Referred¶1
WPC No.1443 of 2010
M/s Lafagarh Gas Agency Through Its Proprietor Smt. Saroj Singh
Union of India
The Chairman, Hindustan Petroleum Company Ltd.
The DGM (LPG) East Zone
The Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Company Ltd. Raipur
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
