Mani Ram v. Dhanwa
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge disposal of two clubbed second appeals claiming partition of ancestral vs. self-acquired property. Court upheld lower appellate findings that suit land was self-acquired by one defendant, dismissing both appeals.
What did the court decide?
Both second appeals dismissed in limine; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Second Appeal No.404 of 2009
Mani Ram, S/o Suna Ram Sande, aged about 40 years, R/o Village Jampali, Post Office Nandorkhurd, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
(Plaintiff) ---- Appellant
Versus
- Dhanwa, S/o Sunaram, aged about 45 years,
- Paharu, S/o Sunaram, aged about 35 years,
- Lila Bai (died and deleted)
- Birichh Ram, S/o Paharu, aged about 24 years, (at the time of filing appeal he was minor),
- Tirith Ram, S/o Paharu, aged about 21 years, (at the time of filing appeal he was minor),
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the first appellate Court erred in holding the suit property as self-acquired of the defendant No.1 and dismissing the plaintiff's claim for partition.
Whether the mandatory injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff by the trial Court was correctly set aside by the first appellate Court.
Whether the findings of fact regarding the defendants acquiring the suit property through registered documents are perverse or contrary to the record.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mani Ram
- respondent
Dhanwa
- respondent
Paharu
- respondent
Birichh Ram
- respondent
Tirith Ram
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/405/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court