On the death of one respondent during the pendency of a second appeal, the High Court held that the right to sue did not survive. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of without adjudicating its merits.
Second appeal finally disposed of as right to sue did not survive the death of the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Second Appeal No. 354 of 2007
All appellants No. 1 to 4 are S/o Shri Krishanabhan Singh, caste– Tanwar, R/o- Village Nunera, Tehsil – Katghora, District Korba (C.G.)
----Appellants/(Plaintiffs)
Versus
All respondents No. 2 to 5 are by caste Tanwar, R/o- Village Nunera, Tah – Katghora, presently Tahsil Pali, District Bilaspur prsently Dist. Korba.
R/o – Village Nunera Tahsil Karghora presently Tah.- Pali, Dist. Bilaspur present Dist. Korba.
Through – Respondent No. 4 Budhkuwar, D/o Dharmpal & respondent No. 5 Girja Baiya, D/o Dharmpal Singh.
---- Respondents/Defendants
2
For Appellants : Mr. Vijay K. Deshmukh, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 to 3 : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent No. 7/State : Mr. Rahul Jha, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
09/01/2020
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
3
Balbhadra Singh and 4 others
Bhuri Baiya
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
