Second Appeal No. 234 of 2009. The High Court of Chhattisgarh held the appeal as infructuous because the appellant-possessed suit accommodation was vacated. The appeal is dismissed.
The second appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Second Appeal No. 234 of 2009
All residents of Link Road, Jacob Chaal, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.)
---- Applicants/defendants
Versus
M/s Raisons Engineers & Contractors, Link Bilaspur through the partner Anoop Singh, S/o Shri Ram Singh, Resident of Link Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
----Respondent/plaintiff
For Applicants : Mr. Rohishek Verma, Advocate on behalf of Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Dy. Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
07/08/2020
has become infructuous as the suit accommodation has already been vacated by
the appellants/defendants.
2
infructuous.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
D/-
Rajamma, Wd/o Late Krishna Kumar
Shiv Kumar, S/o Late Krishna Kumar
Laxman Kumar, S/o Late Krishna Kumar
Manju Devi, D/o Late Krishna Kumar
Nanda Devi, D/o Late Krishna Kumar
M/s Raisons Engineers & Contractors
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
