Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Harmati Vs Baishakha and Anr. — Chhattisgarh HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

Home
Chhattisgarh HC
2020
Harmati Vs Baishakha and Anr.Harmati v. Baishakha and Anr.

Dismissed

Harmati v. Baishakha and Anr.

Chhattisgarh HC4 Feb 2020SA/134/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second Appeal No. 134 of 2008 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite being called for hearing.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

Second Appeal No. 134 of 2008

Harmati d/o. Late Sevakram aged about 62 years r/o. Village Hirri, Tahsiol Masturi Distt. Bilaspur, C.G.

---- Appellant

Versus

Baishakha Bai w/o unknown aged about 50 years r/o. Village Hirri Tahsil Masturi Distt. Bilaspur, C.G.

State of Chhattisgarh through the Collector, Bilaspur, C.G.

---- Respondents

For Appellant : None For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Ravindra Agrawal, Advocate For State/ Respondent No. 2 : Mr. S.K. Agrawal, Panel Lawyer

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Harmati
respondent
Baishakha Bai
respondent
State of Chhattisgarh

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Chhattisgarh HC
Decided on: 4 Feb 2020 · February
Registered: 2 Apr 2008
Case no.: SA/134/2008

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Sanjay K. Agrawal

Hinchha Ram (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs Smt. Shyama Bai
3 Feb 2020
Rukhmani Bai and Others Vs Mohanlal and Others
3 Feb 2020
Ramkumar Vs Sudama and Others
3 Feb 2020
Ravi Shankar and Others Vs Padma and Others
4 Feb 2020

Cite this judgement

Harmati v. Baishakha and Anr., SA/134/2008 (CG), decided on 4 February 2020.

The High Court of Chhattisgarh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Sanjay K. Agrawal

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

In the absence of the appellant appearing in person or through a pleader despite being called in the second round, the Second Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Order On Board

04/02/2020

Even after the matter was called in the second round, none appeared on behalf of the appellant, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

Vishakha

Sanjay K. Agrawal

CNR

CGHC010003242008

Bench

Sanjay K. Agrawal

Disposal

DISMISSED

Guddi Bai Vs Sonkeliya and Others

4 Feb 2020

Rukhmani Bai Vs Kishore and Others

4 Feb 2020