Review petition challenging a division bench judgment. Court held no error apparent on record existed. Ruled review is not a substitute for appeal. Dismissed petition relying on AIR 1995 SC 455.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Review Petition No. 38 of 2020
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Shri N.K. Malaviya, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Vikram Sharma, Deputy Government Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board
Per P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice
04.02.2020
2
Sd/Sd/- (P. R. Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge
Brijmohan
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an error apparent on the face of the record can be found sufficient to invoke the power of review.
Whether the scope of review is limited to the extent decided in Smt. Meera Bhanja vs. Smt. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury (AIR 1995 SC 455).
Whether the review petition should be dismissed in the absence of any substantive error on the face of the record.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Meera Bhanja vs. Smt. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury报告的AIR 1995 SC 455Relied on¶23
Ku. Priya Kale
Alok Ghosh
State of Chhattisgarh
P. R. Ramachandra Menon
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
