Rejects a second application for anticipatory bail filed on medical grounds. The court held that since the applicant was already at liberty and could pursue treatment elsewhere, there were no extraordinary circumstances to reconsider. The prior application had been dismissed on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C.(A). No. 1251 of 2020
Saurabh Shukla, S/o. Shri Chandra Dev Shukla, aged about 35 years, R/o. L.I.G.-15 (wrongly mentioned as C.I.G.), Sector-2, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
----Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police - Station - Dharsiva, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. B.D. Guru, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Adil Minhaj, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Order On Board
06/11/2020
2
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Balram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted on medical grounds despite the applicant already being at liberty and having no new extraordinary circumstances.
Saurabh Shukla
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
