The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the applicant's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged diversion of coal and document fabrication under IPC sections 420 and 34.
Anticipatory bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 1112 of 2020
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Shri Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate For State : Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, Dy.A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
04/12/2020
The applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.70/2018 registered at Police Station – Tamnar, District – Raigarh (CG) for alleged commission of offences under Section 420, 34 of IPC.
2
coal was diverted to another power plant. He submits that since the applicant came to know that the coal has been diverted from the captive power plant of the complainant, he paid the amount equivalent to the cost of 38.440 metric ton only to show his bonafide. According to learned counsel for the applicant, the applicant only hired the vehicle and the vehicle did not belong to him.
Sd/- ( Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ) Judge
Deepti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for anticipatory bail given allegations of fabricating documents and coal diversion under IPC Sections 420 and 34.
Banti Singhania @ Rajesh Agrawal
State Of Chhattisgarh
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
