The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the applicant's second bail application under Section 439 CrPC in a rape case. The court held it was not a fit case for bail release, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence and the duty to avoid rehearsing the case merits.
The second bail application filed by the applicant was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 774 of 2020
Mukesh Kumar Sahu S/o Gangaram Sahu Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Kuthrel Police Station Anda District Durg , Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sho , Police Station Anda, Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
For the Applicant : Shri Aman Pandey, Advocate For the State : Shri Ravi Maheshwari, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
04/02/2020
2
drew my attention on para No. 13, 14 and 18 of photocopy of statement of PW-2 prosecutrix which is part of the bail application, in these circumstances applicant may be released on bail.
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Kamde
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to release on bail in the second round of litigation considering the prima facie case.
Whether detention period, delay in FIR, and medical evidence merit release from custody.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh Kumar Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
