Allowed

Vikash Sharma & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC14 Jan 2020MCRC/7516/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed a regular bail application filed by two applicants detained for alleged involvement in trafficking 15 kg of narcotics under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act, directing them to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicants to furnish personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety each for release on bail.

Vikash Sharma & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Narcotics (NDPS) | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

MCRC No. 7516 of 2019

¶4

Vikash Sharma S/o Bajrang Sharma Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Tusra, Thana - Tusra, District Balangir Orissa.,

¶5

Bhattapanigarhi S/o Judhishtir Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Bijakhaman Basti, Balangir Town, District Balangir (Orissa).,

¶6

---- Applicants Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

¶8

---- Respondent

¶9

For applicants : Shri Sumit Jhanwar, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri V.K.Agrawal, PL

¶10

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

¶11

Order On Board

¶12

14/01/2020

¶13

The applicants have filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as they are in custody in connection with Crime No. 265/2019 registered at police station Simga, district Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 20(b) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

¶14

As per case of the prosecution, on receiving secret information, the police party apprehended and seized 15 kgs. of the contraband from the possession of the applicants who were transporting the same in a pickup van and a four wheeler going towards Bilaspur from Raipur.

¶15

Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the crime. He submits that the ingredients of alleged offence are not attracted against the applicants. He submits that the applicants are in jail since 23.07.2019 and the trial may take some time for its disposal and therefore they may be released on bail.

¶16

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

¶17

Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular the detention period of the applicants, I am inclined to release them on regular bail. Accordingly, the application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is allowed.

¶18

It is directed that in the event of the applicants' furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety each in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned court for their appearance before it as and when directed, they shall be released on bail.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

(Rajani Dubey) Judge

¶21

suguna

Vikash Sharma & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Sharma & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umendra Kumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ajay Kumar @ Bada Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ravi Kumar Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Aagvendra Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manish Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Neelsagar Gond & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh