High Court granted regular bail to the applicant accused of kidnapping, rape, and offences under POCSO, considering him fit for release as material witnesses were examined and prosecutrix did not support the case.
Regular bail granted with furnishing of personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- and one surety in like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. No. 7431 of 2020
Bedram Verma S/o Dhaniram Verma Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Baghmarra, Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
| For the Applicant : Shri Roop Naik, Advocate. |
|---|
| For the Respondent/State : Shri Adil Minhaj, G.A. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant ORDER
01.12.2020
Heard.
2
case accordingly in the trial. The applicant is in jail since about more than 1 ½ years and the trial against him is still not concluded. Hence, it is prayed that the applicant be enlarged on bail during the pendency of trial.
3
perusal of the same, I am of the considered view that this is a fit case for grant of regular bail.
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Nimmi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. being accused of offences under IPC Sections 363, 376 and POCSO Sections 4 and 6.
Whether the absence of trial conclusion and prosecutrix support justifies granting bail despite the nature of the alleged offence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bedram Verma
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
