Allowed

Smt. Rajkumari v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Jan 2020MCRC/445/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants regular bail to an applicant detained in a case punishable under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC. The court directed the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety for the same amount.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court.

Smt. Rajkumari Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Caste Atrocities | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

MCRC No. 445 of 2020

¶4

Smt. Rajkumari W/o Shri Shiv Prasad Chakradhari Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Khapri(Malighori), P.S. And District Balod Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Police Station Balod, District - Balod Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh

¶8

---- Respondent

¶9

For Applicant	: Ms. Aditi Singhvi, Advocate
For Respondent /State	: Shri Wasim Miyan, PL

¶10

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

¶11

Order On Board

¶12

17/01/2020

¶13

The applicant has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as he is in custody in connection with Crime No. 442/2019 registered at police station Balod, district Balod (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 195 (a) 506(B) and 34 IPC and Section 3 (2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶14

Case of the prosecution in brief is that a report was lodged by the complainant against the husband of the applicant. It is alleged that the applicant along with another co-accused has pressurized and threatened the prosecutrix for settlement of the matter.

¶15

Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been

¶16

falsely implicated in the case. She further submits that the allegations are baseless. She submits that the applicant is in jail since 04.11.2019; the charge sheet has been filed and looking to the conduct of the prosecution it is clear that the trial will take time for its conclusion.

¶17

On the other hand counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

¶18

Having heard counsel for the parties, considered the totality of the fact, in particular the nature of allegation and the detention period of the applicant, I am inclined to release him on regular bail. Accordingly, his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is allowed.

¶19

It is directed that in the event of the applicant’s furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one local surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, he shall be released on bail.

¶20

Sd/(Rajani Dubey) Judge

¶21

suguna

Smt. Rajkumari v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Rajkumari v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gokul Prasad Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Marshal Lahare @ Sameer Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajkumar Shrivas Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Mathura Tiwari Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Kusum Lal Sao Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Suraj Bhagat Vs State of Chhattisgarh