Justice Dubey dismissed the second bail application of Yogesh and Balaram Mandle in a murder conspiracy case. The court held that despite delays due to the pandemic, the gravity of the offence precluded bail at the initial stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4356 of 2020
---- Applicants
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicants. : Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board
06.08.2020
2
applicants is that after hatching a conspiracy they committed murder of the deceased Tarun Ratde and concealed his dead body. After completion of investigation, offence has been registered against the applicants and they have been arrested.
3
case, nature and gravity of the case, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the applicants on bail.
Code of Criminal Procedure is rejected at motion stage itself.
Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge
Vijay Sahu
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant regular bail to the applicants under Section 439 CrPC in a murder conspiracy case.
Whether the case should be considered to allow bail at the motion stage.
Whether the delay in trial due to the pandemic warrants bail in a serious offence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yogesh Mandle
Balaram Mandle
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
