Krishnath @ Krishnanath v. the State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a bail application as withdrawn by the applicant. The court directed the trial court to expedite the trial and conclude within six months.
What did the court decide?
Trial court to expedite and conclude trial preferably within 6 months.
What the court decided
Page No.1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3979 of 2020
- Krishnath @ Krishnanath, S/o Shri Japan Ram, Aged About 22 Years, By Caste - Dom, R/o Village - Jhimki (Naya Khuntapani), Thana Bagbahar, Civil and Revenue District-Jashpur Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant Versus
- The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer Police Station Bagbahar, District-Jashpur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
____________________________________________________________ For Applicant : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Adil Minhaj, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board
18/08/2020
- At the outset, counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application and also prays for issuance of direction to the trial Court to expedite the trial against the applicant.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed as withdrawn and the trial expedited.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Krishnath @ Krishnanath
- respondent
The State Of Chhattisgarh
Coram
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCRC/3979/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court