Single judge allowed an application for bail under Section 439 CrPC, noting no objection from the victim and no case against the applicant, despite charges of abduction and POCSO offences.
Allowed the bail application; applicant released on personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3860 of 2020
---- Applicant Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. P.K. Patel, Advocate. For State/respondent : Mr. D.P. Singh, Dy. Adv. General.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Order On Board
07/08/2020
2
admitted in her statement under Section 164 CrPC, regarding the affair with the applicant and that the applicant had proposed to marry her which was denied by the mother of the prosecutrix because of which the prosecutrix by her own free will had accompanied the applicant and resided with him in places, therefore, no case is made out against this applicant, hence, it is prayed that he may be enlarged on regular bail.
3
have no objection in grant of bail to the applicant, hence, I feel inclined to allow the bail application of this applicant.
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Nisha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for regular bail under Section 439 CrPC should be allowed despite charges under IPC and POCSO Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suraj @ Paklu Banjare
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
