The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected a second bail application. Finding the offence serious and noting its adverse impact on society, the Court refused bail despite the applicant's detention period and the delay in trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 356 of 2020
Versus
---- Respondent
For applicant Mr. Basant Dewangan, Adv. For Respondent/State Mr. Raghvendra Verma, GA
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order on Board
18-2-2020
2
my attention on the certified copy of the statements of P.W. 1 Dharmendra Kumar Sahu, P.W. 2 Ajay Kumar Rathore, P.W. 3 Shyam Kumar Patel, P.W. 4 Ashok Kumar Nirmalkar, P.W. 5 Manoj Kumar Shrimor, P.W. 6 Haran Sarkar, P.W. 7 Dilip Kumar, P.W. 8 Krishna Kumar Patel and P.W. 9 Ketram Yadav.
Sd/(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
pathak
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to the applicant on the second bail application despite the delay in trial and the applicant's detention period.
Whether the seriousness of the alleged offences and the impact on society outweigh the factors necessitating bail.
Whether the Court can appreciate the evidence at the bail stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nirmal Dhaneliya
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Darri
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
