The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The court held that important witnesses including the minor victim had not been examined and the statement needed appreciation by the trial court, making this not a fit case for bail.
Application for regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.CR.C. No. 2954 of 2020
Rahul Kade @ Bablu, S/o. Late Venkat Rao Kade, Aged About 26 Years, R/o. Kalkapara, Behind Ashoka Hotel, Dongargarh, P.S. Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through SHO, Police Chowki CSEB, P.S. Kotwali, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Anshul Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Order On Board
05/08/2020
2
3
Court is of the opinion that present is not a fit case, in which, the
applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.
is rejected.
Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Balram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail in a case involving abduction of a minor for ransom.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul Kade @ Bablu
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
