The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a recall application. The court observed that while the issue of OBC status became academic due to term expiry, the rejection was not final as it lacked an enquiry by the Caste Scrutiny Committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 143 of 2020
Versus
---- Respondents
___________________________________________________________________ For Applicant/s : Ms. Ruchi Nagar, Advocate. For State : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
13/02/2020
2
which cloud was cash on his caste status as OBC. This resulted in removal of the petitioner from the office of the Counsellor. However, during the pendency of petition, the term of the office of Counsellor itself came to an end.
Sd/(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge
Ravi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to recall an order disposing a petition as rendered infructuous on representations being made.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ikram Ahmed
State Of Chhattisgarh
Additional Collector, Raipur
Sub Divisional Officer (Certification)
Tehsildar Dharsiwan
Nagar Panchayat Birgaon
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
