The court recalled an order dismissing a second appeal for want of prosecution and restored the appeal to its original number, subject to a deposit of Rs.1,000/- in the Legal Aid Committee.
Order of dismissal for want of prosecution is recalled and the appeal is restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 1150 of 2019
---- Applicants
Versus
---- Respondents
For Applicants : Shri Ravindra Sharma, Advocate For State : Shri Ankur Kashyap, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
03/01/2020
Second Appeal No.11/2003 was dismissed for want of prosecution on 04/12/2019.
Taking into consideration the cause shown in the application, particularly, that the appeal has been dismissed without there being any hearing on merits of the
2
case, the order of dismissal for want of prosecution is hereby recalled and the appeal is restored to its original number subject to cost of Rs.1,000/- to be deposited in the Legal Aid Committee of the High Court.
Sd/-
( Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ) Judge
Deepti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the dismissal of Second Appeal No.11/2003 for want of prosecution without hearing on merits is to be recalled.
Baratu S/o Baishakhu
Bhog Singh S/o Baishakhu
Jageshar S/o Baishakhu
Lakhan Lal S/o Late Karmu
Shyam Kumari D/o Karmu
Bhago Bai D/o Dharmu
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
