The High Court dismissed Application No. 198 of 2018 under CrPC which sought to condone delay and appeal against acquittal. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the ingredients of abetment to suicide under Section 305 IPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRA No. 198 of 2018
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 198 of 2015
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner/State
Mr. Ashish Gupta, Panel Lawyer
DB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra &
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Chourdiya
Order On Board by Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
12.2.2020
2
CRA No. 198 of 2018
condoned.
3
CRA No. 198 of 2018
persons have called the deceased prior to the date of the incident or that they assaulted him on a day prior to the date of his commission of suicide.
Sd/- Sd/-
( Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Judge
Shyna
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prosecution has proved the ingredients of Section 305 of IPC regarding abetment to commit suicide?
Whether leave should be granted for appeal against the acquittal of the accused persons?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Bilaspur
Amarnath @ Amru Agrawal
Sanjay Kumar Tulsyan
Dewendra Gupta
Tekchand Karda @ Teku
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Gautam Chourdiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
