The petitioner moved to withdraw his writ petition in the Supreme Court after his representation was rejected. The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the withdrawal, dismissing the petition with liberty to approach other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CONT No. 863 of 2020
Arvind Kumar Khandekar S/o Lt. Shri Lakhan Lal Khandekar, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village- Raseda, Post Office Arjuni, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---Respondents
| 26/11/2020 | Shri Atul Kumar Kesharwani, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Mateen Siddiqui, counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the representation has been rejected. |
|---|---|
| gouri | Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy available to him under the law. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE |
Arvind Kumar Khandekar
Dr. Sanjay Alung
Shri C. L. Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
