Petitioner challenged via contempt proceedings the non-joining of a job appointment. Respondents undertook to grant joining within three days, rendering the petition moot.
The contempt petition was disposed off as nothing survived for adjudication after respondents undertook to issue joining within three days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CONT No. 618 of 2020
Chhunku @ Bhishm S/o Budhram Aged About 50 Years R/o Village- Kosamkunda, Tahsil And P.S. Bilaigarh, District- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
| 02.09.2020 | Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate for the Petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate for the Respondents. Heard Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the appointment order of the applicant has already been issued and the doubt having been raised by the petitioner's counsel that the petitioner may not be given the joining, it is submitted that the joining would be given within 3 days. In view of such submission, nothing survives for adjudication in the contempt petition. Accordingly, it is disposed off. |
|
| ashok | Sd/- Li (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
Chhunku @ Bhishm
Shri Sunil Kumar Jain
Shri A.K. Soni
Shri Amit Kumar
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
