High Court ordered a contempt petitioner's case disposed of as the impugned order was deemed complied with after respondents decided not to grant the petitioner relief.
Contempt petition disposed of; right to adjudicate on subsequent development reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 475 of 2019
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondents
For Applicant : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Alok Baskhi, counsel For Respondent No.2 : Smt. Sameeksha Gupta, counsel on behalf of Mr. Dhiraj K. Wankhede For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Vidhya Bhushan Soni, Adv on behalf of Mr. R.S. Baghel, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board
06.01.2020
-2-
representation of the petitioner/applicant, so far as granting of kramonnati is concerned.
Sd/-
Rahul
Smt. Satyabhama Patel
Shri G. R. Markam
Smt. Tanuja Salam
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
