Dismissed

Harileya Bai v. Shri Jai Singh Mahsake

Chhattisgarh HC22 Jan 2020CONT/32/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh heard a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an order directing reconsideration of the petitioner's regularisation case. The court directed the Divisional Forest Officer to communicate the decision in writing within seven days and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Divisional Forest Officer to communicate written decision to the petitioner within 7 days of receipt of this order.

Harileya Bai Vs Shri Jai Singh Mahsake — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

CONT No. 32 of 2020

¶5

Harileya Bai W/o Narsingh Yadav Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Bhulatola, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh working At Forest Range Office Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

Shri Jai Singh Mahsake, Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶9

Sangeeta Gupta Chief Conservator Of Forest Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶10

S.S.D. Badgaiya Conservator Of Forest, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶11

S.P. Paikra The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh

¶12

Rajesh Nandulkar Forest Range Officer, Forest Range Balod, Forest Division, Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh

¶13

M. Govind Rao S/o M.S. Rao, Retired Forest Divisional Officer, Balod Division, Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh. At Present R/o Dharampura, Radhaswami Satsang Chowk, Pani Tanki, Pan Thela Ke Pas, Raipur, District Raipur

¶14

---- Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner : Shri Jitendra Gupta, Advocate

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

¶17

Order On Board

¶18

22/01/2020

¶19

This petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 30/08/2017 passed in WPS No.4167/2017 as also subsequent order dated 26/07/2019 passed in Cont. No.572/2019.

¶20

After going through the orders and communication placed on record, it appears that the petitioner's grievance in the second round of the contempt petition

¶21

¶22

that despite order dated 26/07/2019 requiring the competent authority i.e. Divisional Forest Officer, Balod to reconsider petitioner's case for regularisation in appropriate manner as directed therein, no orders have been passed.

¶23

Order dated 26/07/2019 requiring the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Balod to reconsider the case of the petitioner. The petition has been filed alleging that till the date of filing of the petition, the petitioner did not receive any information with regard to passing of order, if any, in compliance of order dated 26/07/2019 passed in Cont. No.572/2019. The Divisional Forest Officer, Balod shall communicate in writing to the petitioner, decision taken by him in compliance of order dated 26/07/2019 passed in Cont. No.572/2019 within a period of 7 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Thereafter, the petitioner, if eventuality so arises, may revive this petition.

¶24

With the aforesaid direction, the contempt petition is closed.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

( Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ) Judge

¶27

Deepti

Harileya Bai v. Shri Jai Singh Mahsake

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harileya Bai v. Shri Jai Singh Mahsake

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Rai and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Sitaram Sethiya Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Board of Revenue

Smt. Parvati Sahu Vs Shri Jai Singh Mahsake

Dinesh Singh Vs Suraj Kumar Sahu

Loknath (Dead) through Lrs Shribachh Kumar Bhoi Vs Sindhu