Disposed

Pratima Mahout v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC11 Feb 2019WPS/863/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged the appointment of respondent No.6 as an Angan Badi Worker by the Collector. Unable to get a final decision on her earlier objection, the court directed the Collector to decide her appeal within 90 days after receipt of the certified copy of this order.

What did the court decide?

The Collector directed to decide the petitioner's objection to the appointment within 90 days.

Pratima Mahout Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 863 OF 2019

¶5

Pratima Mahout W/o Mahendra Mahout Aged About 25 Years R/o Chip House, Godri Para, Ward No. 31, Chirmiri, Police Station Chirmiri, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

¶6

…Petitioner(s)

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Urban Administration Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Woman And Child Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

3. The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Chirmiri, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

4. The Collector Koriya, Baikunthpur District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

5. District Programme Officer Woman And Child Development Department, Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

¶13

6. Laxmi Soni W/o Narendra Kumar Soni R/o Ward No. 31, Shivaji Ward Old Mines, Godripara, Chirmiri Police Station Chirmiri District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

… Respondent(s)

¶15

For Petitioner : Shri Punit Ruparel, Advocate. For Respondents-State : Shri Sameer Behar, Panel Lawyer.

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

¶17

Order on Board

¶18

11.02.2019

¶19

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is appointment of the respondent No.6 as Angan Badi Worker for the Angan Badi Centre at Ward No.31, Old Mines, Chirmiri.

¶20

2. The contention of the petitioner is that, against the order of appointment of respondent No.6 as Angan Badi Worker, the petitioner has already preferred an objection before the Collector, Koriya on 11.01.2019 (Annexure P/10) but till date no final decision have been taken. According to the petitioner, the respondent No.6 have been granted appointment flouting the rules pertaining to recruitment of Angan Baid Workers.

¶21

3. Given the aforesaid facts, this court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if this petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.4 to

¶22

¶23

take an appropriate decision on the objection/appeal preferred by the petitioner against the appointment of respondent No.6 as Angan Badi Worker for Ward No.31, Old Mines, Chirmiri. Let the Collector take an appropriate decision, on due verification of facts, within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondent No.4 so far as order passed by this court is concerned.

¶24

4. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off.

¶25

Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) Judge

¶26

inder

Pratima Mahout v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratima Mahout v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saumitra Mansingh Mahapatra Vs the State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Dinesh Kumar Sonwan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Aman Jain Vs Shri E.R. Kapale

Rekha Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs C R Masih

Smt. Badrika Sidar Vs State of Chhattisgarh