Disposed

Anand Rao v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC3 Jan 2019WPS/8468/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a school lecturer suspended and punished with stoppage of increments, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the speedy disposal of his pending appeal. The High Court directed the Secretary, School Education Department to decide the appeal within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 1 to decide the petitioner's pending appeal within 3 months.

Anand Rao Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

Writ Petition (S) No. 8468 of 2018

¶5

Anand Rao S/o Urkuriya Rao, Aged About 55 Years, Working As Lecturer Political Science, At Middle School Kilkila, Post Durdura, Tahsil Lailunga, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, R/o Magarpara, Behind Ambedkar School, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

2. Director, Public Instructions, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

3. Collector Cum District Magistrate, Raighar, District - Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

¶11

---- Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner	: Shri K. S. Pawar with Ms. Preeti Yadav,
	Advocates.
For State	: Shri Ratan Pusty, Govt. Advocate

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

¶14

03/01/2019

¶15

1. The limited grievance which the petitioner raised in the present writ petition is for a direction to respondent no.1 to decide the pending appeal against the order of punishment inflicted upon the petitioner.

¶16

2. Contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner while working as a lecturer was placed under suspension on 04.03.2013 and subsequently was inflicted with a punishment of stoppage of 2 annual increments with cumulative effect vide order dated 02.02.2016. Against the said order, the petitioner preferred an

¶17

¶18

appeal before the competent authority but the appeal till date has not been decided.

¶19

3. Given the factual matrix of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to decide the appeal of the petitioner at the earliest preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

(P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE

¶22

Khatai

Anand Rao v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Rao v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Dinkar Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Rohit Kumar Dewangan Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Santosh Kumar Kalar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Usha Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Umesh Kumar Bhagat Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shantanu Bhattacharya Vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited