The writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted that the petitioner had been promoted, rendering the cause of action exhausted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
Writ Petition (S) No. 4302 of 2016
Ram Ashrya Kol Versus State of Chhattisgarh and others
| 08.05.2019 | Shri Abhishek Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Shri Rahul Mishra, Dy. G.A. for the State. Counsel for the petitioner, at this juncture, submits that the petitioner in the present writ petition has since been promoted and as such the writ petition to that extent has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. |
|
| Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE |
Khatai
Ram Ashrya Kol
State of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
