The single-judge bench held the WPS to have become infructuous after considering the dispute nature and State's reply, dismissing the petition while reserving the right for the petitioner to challenge adverse developments.
The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No. 2339 of 2010
Laxman Prasad Chandra Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
| 01.02.2019 | Shri Parag Kotecha and Shri Shalvik Tiwari, Advocates for the petitioner. Ms. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer for the State. Considering the nature of dispute raised by the petitioner and the reply filed by the State, this court is of the opinion that the matter has since become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge any subsequent development detrimental to his interest. |
|---|---|
| Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge |
Inder/Arvind
Laxman Prasad Chandra
State of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
