The High Court of Chhattisgarh, treating the PIL on overloading as concluded, observed that authorities had filed an affidavit and put mechanisms to check overloading in place, and disposed of the petition.
The PIL stands disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 99 of 2017
---- Petitioners
Versus
2
-----Respondents
| ------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |
|---|---|
| For Petitioners | : Mr. MPS Bhatia, Advocate |
| For Respondents /State | : Mr. Kanak Tiwari, Advocate General with Mr. Richa Shukla, Dy. Govt. Advocate and Mrs. Fauzia Mirza, Additional Advocate General |
| For Respondent- 2 | : Shri B.Gopa Kumar, Assistant Solicitor General |
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice & Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor Order on Board
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
18.02.2019
3
Sd/Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Vimla Singh Kapoor) Chief Justice Judge
Santosh
Trilok Singh S/o Sardar Mohan Singh
Chhattisgarh Truck Malik Sangh
State of Chhattisgarh
Union of India
The Transport Commissioner Chhattisgarh
The Additional Transport Commissioner Chhattisgarh
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
