The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, noting that learned counsel for the parties had submitted that the petition had become infructuous with the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No. 69 of 2012
Natwar Agrawal (Beriwal), S/o Late Shri Baijnath Beriwal, aged about 56 years, Resident of Kotra Road, Chunabhatta, Raigarh, District – Raipur (C.G.)
----Petitioner
Versus
2
The respondents No. 6 to 23 are resident of Danipara, Bus Stand Road Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)
(So called seller of the land in question)
The respondents No. 24 to 27 are by caste – Agrawal, resident of Sadar Bazar Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)
(so called consentee of sale of the land in question)
(So called purchaser of the land in question and Director of Red Carpet build cone Limited)
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 to 5 : Mr. Rahul Jha, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
20/11/2019
(1) Learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that with the passage of time, this petition has become infructuous.
(2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the petitioners are at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
D/-
3
4
Natwar Agrawal (Beriwal)
State of Chhattisgarh
The Superintendent of Police, Raigarh
The Collector, Raigarh
Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line, Raigarh
The Sub Registrar, Raigarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
