The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or make any representation at the court calls despite the matter being passed over once in her absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPCR No. 39 of 2017
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
| 04.02.2019 | None for the petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Shri Akash Pandey, Penal Lawyer for the State/Respondents No.1 to 4. Shri Basant Dewangan, counsel for the Respondents No. 5 & 6. The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even in the second call none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the Court except to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. |
|
| Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge |
|
| Ashu |
Radha Bai
State of Chhattisgarh
The Collector, Janjgir Champa
Sub Divisional Magistrate (R), Sakti
Station House Officer, Police Station Sakti
Gopal, S/o. Narayan Patel
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
