Vimal Kumar Nayak v. Rajeev Agrawal
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the single judge noting that the petition had become infructuous with the passage of time.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the single judge noting that the petition had become infructuous with the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No. 266 of 2017
---- Petitioners
Versus
--- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Sinha, Advocate For State : Ms. Shivali Dubey, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
10.05.2019
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Harneet
Vimal Kumar Nayak
Ranveer Singh Nayak
Rajeev Agrawal
Amit Agrawal
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court