Dismissed
Guharam v. Ramdas
Chhattisgarh HCWPC/3538/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur dismissed a writ petition challenging an order directing legal heirs to be brought on record after 17 years, holding no case for interference due to pending final hearing.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
NAFR
¶3
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
¶4
WPC No. 3538 of 2018
¶5
- Guharam S/o Shivdhan Kanwar Aged About 55 Years
¶6
- Gopal S/o Shivdhan Aged About 60 Years
¶7
Both are By Caste Gond, R/o Village Mandanpur, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.
¶8
---- Petitioner
¶9
Versus
¶10
- Ramdas S/o Daulatram Kalar
¶11
- Maniram (Died) Through Lrs.
¶12
- A) Ramkumar S/o Late Maniram
¶13
- B) Rajkumar, S/o Late Maniram
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the writ court can interfere when the revisionist is brought on record after 17 years pending final hearing.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Guharam
- petitioner
Gopal
- respondent
Ramdas
- respondent
Lalan Prasad
- respondent
Ramehswar Prasad
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPC/3538/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court