This order directed the petitioner to file a representation to the Collector for compensation assessment, following the Division Bench direction to revise multipliers used in the acquisition.
Direction to petitioner to move a representation before the Collector within 4 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No.325 of 2019
Vijay Kumar Kaushik, S/o Late Shri Krishna Kaushik, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Pand, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner Shri S. Majid Ali, Advocate For Respondent-UOI Shri B. Gopa Kumar, ASG For Respondent-State Shri Rajesh Singh, Dy. GA
Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
04/02/2019
Petitioners but all such persons whose lands have been acquired and a multiplier of 1.00 has been used for calculating the compensation, the same will be required to be revised and revisited in light of the new notification, which is required to be notified by the State Government, on priority.”
Sd/Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge
Nirala
1 issue framed by the court
What procedure must the petitioner follow after this court's order regarding compensation multiplier?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Anita Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and othersFollowed¶21
WPC No.1649 of 2017 ( Smt. Anita Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others )
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vijay Kumar Kaushik
State Of Chhattisgarh
Union Of India
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
