Petitioner challenged failure to issue affiliation letter for increased nursing seats. Court held petition infructuous as relief could not be backdated to the expired 2016-2017 academic year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 3049 of 2017
Shri Shankaracharya College of Nursing through its Principal, Mrs. Sindhu Menon, Wife of Shri Anil Menon, Aged About 41 Years, Amdi Nagar, H U D C O , Bhilai, Chhattisgarh. 490009 ---- Petitioner
Versus
| 10.05.2019 | Mr. A.D. Kuldeep counsel for the petitioner. Heard. In this writ petition, the petitioner has mainly prayed for the following relief(s) : “10.1 Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 13.06.2017 (Annexure P/5 & Annexure P/6) ; 10.2 Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent no.1 to immediately issue letter of affiliation for 8 seats in Med Surg, 02 Seats in Psy, 04 Seats in OBG, 02 seats in Pae& 2 seats in CHN for the academic year 2016-2017” I |
|---|---|
| R a o | The issue pertains to increase of seats for the academic year 2016-2017. It appears that by lapse of time, the petition has become infructuous as the relief(s) sought in the petition cannot be set back to the academic year of 2016-2017. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to increase nursing seats can be allowed when the requested academic year has already passed.
Shri Shankaracharya College of Nursing through its Principal, Mrs. Sindhu Menon
Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Memorial Health Sciences And Ayush University of Chhattisgarh
Indian Nursing Council
GOUTAM BHADURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
