The High Court of Chhattisgarh considered a writ petition for payment of due amount for completed work. The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass a speaking order within two months.
Director to consider petitioner's representation for payment release and pass speaking order within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 22 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
5. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Champa, Division Champa District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
WPC No. 53 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
2
5. Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Champa, Division Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
For Petitioners Mr. Praveen Dhurandhar, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Rajesh R. Singh, Dy. GA
Order On Board By
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
1/3/2019
3
authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation, at the earliest, by a speaking order within a period of 2 months from the date of submission of representation.
(Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Judge
Shyna
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should order the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation for releasing the completed work payment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Om Sai Traders and Tent House Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and othersExplained¶31
WA No.38/2015 ( Om Sai Traders and Tent House Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others )
M/s R. B. Construction
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
