Shri Shailendra Dubey, the learned Additional Advocate General and Shri Gagan Tiwari, the learned Deputy Government Advocate assisting the learned Additional Advocate General, submit that the course and proceedings as to how the undisputed amount payable has been worked out have been clearly stated in the version filed before this Court. It is stated that the Petitioner was required to produce relevant materials as to the engagement of 6 doctors and as to the payment made to them, which was not complied with. In the said circumstance, the amount stated as payable under that head (Rs. 70,000 x 6 x 10 months = Rs. 42,00,000/-) was disallowed. With regard to the necessity to engage 99 staff for operating the 11 ambulances in three shifts, only 33 persons were engaged by the Petitioner, thus, with a deficit of 66. Since the per month salary payable to such staff is stated as Rs. 12,000/-, a sum of Rs.79,20,000/- (66 x Rs. 12,000 x 10 months) also came to be deleted. There was deletion of amounts under some other heads as well and the total amount which came to be disallowed amounted to Rs. 1,24,63,520/as against the total sum of Rs. 1,88,12,051/- claimed by the Petitioner. Thus, the actual amount payable, according to the Respondents was only Rs. 63,48,531/- and after giving credit to the sum of Rs. 31,61,946/- paid earlier and a further a sum of Rs. 15,00,000/- paid subsequently, the balance, came only to Rs. 19,28,175/-. After deducting the TDS, the Petitioner has already been issued a cheque for the sum of Rs. 18,89,611/-, a copy of which has already been put on record.
