The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed multiple writ petitions filed by various individuals. counsel submitted these matters were covered by a prior judgment, the court disposed of the petitions accordingly in terms of that earlier order.
The writ petitions were disposed of in terms of the order passed in WPC No.2771/2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 15 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
6. Tahsildar Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
WPC No. 16 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
2
`---- Respondent
WPC No. 23 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
6. Tahsildar Through Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
3
WPC No. 25 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
6. Tahsildar Khairagarh, Disrtict- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
WPC No. 26 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
4
6. Tahsildar Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
WPC No. 27 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
6. Tahsildar Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
WPC No. 37 of 2019
5
---- Petitioner
Versus
6. Tahsildar Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
WPC No. 38 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
6
6. Tahsildar Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
---- Petitioner
Versus
6. Tahsildar Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
WPC No. 50 of 2019
7
Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner Versus
6. Tahsildar Khairagarh District Rajanandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent
WPC No. 56 of 2019
• Atul Chopda S/o Late Shri Vijay Lal Chopda Aged About 42 Years R/o Killapara Ward No.11, Police Station and Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
8
Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
6. Tahsildar Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
WPC No. 57 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
6. Tahsildar Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
And
WPC No. 48 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
9
Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents
For Petitioners Shri F. S. Khare, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. GA
Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
09/01/2019
Nirala
Sd/Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Premraj Sharma vs State of Chhattisgarh and othersFollowed¶1
WPC No.2771/2018 (Premraj Sharma vs State of Chhattisgarh and others)
Kanhaiya Bais
State Of Chhattisgarh
Gopi Nath Mandir Trust
Nitesh Singh Gaharwar
Manmohan Chandwani
Gulab Chand
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
