The Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a depositor of PACL India Limited. It held there was no privity of contract or legal duty for public authorities to recover funds or direct payment for private disputes, directing the petitioner to file a civil suit against the company.
None; Civil suit directed against the company.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 126 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner Shri Punit Ruparel, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. GA
Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
16/01/2019
Sd/-
Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge
Nirala
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition can be filed claiming direction from public authorities to recover money deposited with a chit fund company and pay it to the depositor.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Devraj Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs (Police)
Canera Bank Branch Mahasamund
Director General Of Police, Raipur
Collector, Mahasamund
Superintendent Of Police, Mahasamund
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
