Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioner failed to appear after repeated calls.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 1084 of 2014
Kunjram Dhritlahre S/o Shmaylal Dhritlahre, Aged About 69 Years R/o Village Koora, P.S. Nandghat, Tahsil Nawagarh, Civil & Revenue Distt. Bemetara C.G., Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioners
Versus
| 08.05.2019 | No one appears for the petitioner when the matter is called in second round. Mr. Sumit Singh, Panel Lawyer, for the State. Since no one appears to argue the case on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated call, this Court is left with no other way except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|---|---|
| R a o | Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE |
Kunjram Dhritlahre
State of Chhattisgarh
Gram Panchayat Koora
The Tahsildar Nawagarh
The Sub Divisional Officer Bemetara
GOUTAM BHADURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
