The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution as infructuous because the underlying civil suit had already been decided by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 850 of 2013
---- Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. Ankur Singh, Advocate For State : Mr. Akash Pandey, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
07/05/19
2
has already been decided. As such, this writ petition has become infructuous.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Harneet
Smt. Ramkali
Smt. Meena Thakur
Rishi Kumar
Rajkumar
Nand Kumar
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
